Showing posts with label law. Show all posts
Showing posts with label law. Show all posts

Monday, January 27, 2025

Rant: Immigrants & Our Culinary Debt

(Ten years ago, I first posted this Rant, and considering recent events and the significance of these issues at this time, I feel it's vital to bring back this Rant due to its applicability in the current crisis. I've expanded and revised it from its original form to be more relevant to the immediate issues.)

The fate immigrants is a significant issue right now, with plenty of heated rhetoric and arguments. Fear is at the heart of much of the discussion and the actual risks from these undocumented immigrants is much, much less than the doomsayers proclaim. Too much of the anti-immigrant rhetoric is based on lies and fabrications, and if we examine history, we see those same lies and fabrication have been made against many different immigrant groups over the last couple centuries. 

For example, during the 19th century, Chinese immigrants were accused of eating dogs and cats, although there wasn't a shred of evidence to back up that accusation. And we see those same lies being lodged against other immigrant groups, once again without any evidence to support the accusations. In addition, during that same century, many Irish and Italian immigrants were accused of being criminals, although once again, the evidence didn't support such an accusation. Today, why are these racist accusations, without any supporting evidence, still being made against immigrant groups? This fear mongering needs to stop!

The basic humanity of immigrants needs to factor far greater into our discussions, and compassion needs to be a prominent value. America owes a huge debt to the immigrants which have come to our country over the centuries. They bring a diversity to our country which only benefits us all. Our country would not be as great as it is without the diversity that such people bring. And the important benefits they bring outweigh the small risk that is entailed. We cannot become insular, shutting our borders to these people.

Yes, there may be some bad apples in the bunch but there are bad apples everywhere, including people who have lived in this country their entire lives. We have to understand that these bad apples are a tiny exception and far from the rule. Those bad apples do not reflect the general mentality and behavior of the greatest majority of immigrants. We already have vetting procedures to help minimize those risks.

Let's consider but one area where America owes a huge debt to immigrants: our culinary scene. There are plenty of other significant areas that can be discussed but I just want to concentrate on this one area for now.

First, most restaurant kitchens, all across the country, couldn't operate without the immigrants who perform some of the most basic, and still very important, duties, from dish washing to prep work. They commonly work behind the scenes, unseen by the restaurant diners who might only may know the main chef. As they work unseen, too many people fail to understand their vital role and their importance to what ends up on your plate.

I've talked to a number of chefs who have been immensely grateful for these workers. Few others have been willing to do such jobs, from dish washing to basic prep work. Without these immigrants, it would be difficult to find others willing to do these duties. In addition, the chefs uniformly state that they are some of the hardest working people they know. For a significant number of these immigrants, they work multiple jobs, maybe in a couple different kitchens. These people contribute significantly to their community.

Second, these immigrants bring to the U.S. their home cuisines, including different ingredients, recipes and techniques. They have created a greater diversity in our culinary scene, opening diners up to so many new and different foods. Consider Boston and its neighboring communities and try to count the numerous cuisines from different countries which are represented, which wouldn't exist except for the influx of refugees and immigrants to our country. Where would be without the many thousands of Chinese restaurants in the U.S.? Consider that 10% of all restaurants in the U.S. serve Mexican food. 

In addition, other chefs have adopted the ingredients, recipes and techniques of these refugees and immigrants. Their culinary heritage has spread across the country, becoming firmly ingrained in our society. Without their contributions, our culinary world would be boring and plain. We revel in culinary diversity but need to understand and appreciate the myriad contributions of those refugees and immigrants.

Third, the presence of immigrants in restaurant kitchens, plus the spread of their cuisines, helps to make our communities more diverse, and more tolerant of differences. When people are exposed to more diversity, they become more worldly, and can better understand that despite our differences, we share many similarities too. We don't need a 50th burger joint in the area, but we certainly could use more restaurants from places like Guatemala, Armenia, Uruguay, Georgia, Nepal, and more.

Fourth, we need to understand that 60-70% of agricultural workers in the U.S. are immigrants, including 40% who are undocumented. This is essential work, helping to put food on all of our tables. Without all of these immigrants, food prices would rise and rise. Food prices are already currently high, and deporting millions of immigrants will only make food prices even higher. 

Rather than worrying so much about the greatly exaggerated risks of immigrants, let us devote much more consideration to all of their positive contributions they can make to our country. Let us embrace our humanity and compassion, and stand up for these immigrants.

Tuesday, January 14, 2025

A History of Sake Brewing in the U.S. (Part 1)

The sale and manufacture must be a source of great profit, for it is consumed in enormous quantities and on every possible occasion in the realms of the mikado and is shipped extensively to all parts of the world where his subjects find abiding places.”
--San  Francisco Call, December 18, 1910: An article titled Sake, The National Booze of the Japanese by Mary Ogden Vaughan

INTRODUCTION

When is the last time you drank a cup of Sake? Was it a Sake imported from Japan, or one produced in the U.S.? Did you drink it on its own, or paired with food? If you consumed it with food, was it with Asian cuisine? Was it served hot or chilled?  

According to the Japan Sake and Shochu Makers Association, exports of Japanese Sake to the U.S. having been growing over the last ten years or so. In 2022, exports reached about 9 million liters (equivalent to about 1 million cases of 750ml bottles). And in 2015, domestic Sake production consisted of about 19.2 million liters. (equivalent to about 2.1 million cases of 750ml bottles). In comparison, in 2023, in California alone, wine production reached about 280 million cases and total wine production in the U.S. equaled about 325 million cases. In addition, total wine exports to the U.S totaled about 192 million cases.

Thus, the total amount of Sake consumed in the U.S. is about 0.6% of the total amount of wine produced in the U.S. If you also consider beer and spirit production and imports in the U.S., Sake consumption becomes even more insignificant. Sake remains a niche beverage, with the potential for substantial growth.

Currently, there are about twenty or so Sake breweries, spanning across the U.S., that already exist or are in the works to open in the near future. Domestic Sake production accounts for about two-thirds of all Sake consumed in the U.S. During the past roughly 20 years, other U.S. Sake breweries have opened, but have since closed for a variety of reasons. The oldest of the still-operating Sake breweries was founded in the late 1970s.

However, did Sake breweries exist in the U.S. before that time? If so, when was the first Sake brewery established in the U.S.?

On my first trip to San Francisco, over 20 years ago, I visited the Tasting Room & Sake Museum of Takara Sake USA, Inc., which was founded in 1983 in Berkeley. It was a fun experience at the time, especially seeing some of the historical artifacts and information on 19th century Sake brewing. However, at that time, I was unaware that Berkeley was actually the site of the first U.S. Sake brewery!

All of the articles and books I'd previously read claimed that the first Sake brewery located outside of Japan was established in Hawaii, the Honolulu Japanese Sake Brewery Co. During the 1940s, the first newspapers started to claim that the Honolulu Japanese Sake Brewery Co. had been the first Sake brewery located outside of Japan. Even the brewery would eventually make that same claim. None of those newspapers contested that claim. Many people still believe that to be true but through my own research, I've learned otherwise. 

After perusing through thousands of newspaper articles, books, magazines and websites, I've discovered that the Honolulu Japanese Sake Brewery Co. might actually have been the fourth or fifth Sake brewery established in the U.S. At the start of the first Hawaiian Sake breweries, around 1908, they even acknowledged that they weren't the first, and that the Japan Brewing Co., in Berkeley, California, predated all of them. Over thirty years later, memories became dim and the truth became muddled with myth.  

However, even though they weren't the first, the Honolulu Japanese Sake brewery was more successful, more long lasting, and left a much greater legacy than any other of the early Sake breweries in the U.S. In fact, for many of these first breweries, we know little more than the most basic of information, such as their name and location. The Honolulu Japanese Sake Brewery Co. wasn't the first but I don't think anyone will argue that it wasn't the most important.

As few people know about these early Sake breweries, I wanted to explore the fascinating history of these first Sake breweries as well as to look at our country’s introduction and perception of this intriguing Japanese alcohol. I'll also explore some of the failed attempts to establish Sake breweries, including in Chicago, Texas, and Hawaii. Plus, this tale will also relate some of the story of the Japanese immigration to Hawaii and the U.S., as it was central to Sake’s existence in this country.

The first Sake brewery in the U.S. was incorporated in 1901, and others were established over the next twenty years, until the start of Prohibition. Then, once Prohibition was repealed, a few Sake breweries restarted operations while other new breweries sprung up. However, they all needed to close with the start of World War II. After the war, a few Sake breweries returned, although only one lasted through the 1970s and beyond. The end of the 1970s would also see two new Sake breweries, issuing in the start of the modern phase of U.S. Sake breweries.

I'm sure you'll find plenty of fascinating information which is new to you, and which will broaden your understanding of Sake and its vibrant history in this country. In 2026, the U.S. will celebrate the 125th Anniversary of the incorporation of the Japan Brewing Co., the first U.S. Sake brewery, once located in Berkeley, California.

The original version of this article was first posted in April 2015, and has seen multiple expansions and revisions over the years due to additional research. Most recently, in 2024, I've added a significant expansion to this article. I've also chosen to break up the lengthy article into four Parts, to make it easier to read and handle. Additional research is certainly warranted and there will continue to be additional expansions/revisions in the future.


Initial Impressions of Sake in the U.S. 

When did Japanese Sake first arrive in the U.S.? We might never know the exact answer but we can speculate. The first Europeans likely to have tasted Japanese Sake were two or three Portuguese merchants whose ship, in 1542 or 1543, was forced by the weather to land on the Japanese island of Tanegashima. Lord Tanegashima Tokitaka feted these men, and it seems logical that the sailors were presented Sake, an alcoholic beverage made from rice, that was an integral element of Japanese life. It's also in 1543, when it's claimed that the Japanese of Tanegashima were introduced to European firearms. 

During the next several years, other Portuguese merchants journeyed to Japan and around 1547, Captain Jorge Alvares wrote a report on his visit to Japan, mentioning Sake. This might have been the earliest known European record mentioning Sake. In The Christian Century in Japan, 1549-1650, by C.R. Boxer (1951), it was noted that Alvares “... never saw anyone much the worse for liquor, since, when a man had had enough rice wine (sake) he lay down and slept it off.” 

Other Europeans also wrote about Japan during the second half of the 16th century and into the 17th century, and there would be a number of references to Sake, although the references were most often in Portuguese and Dutch. It's likely that some Sake thus ended up in Europe, brought by merchants, sailors and others who had visited Japan. In the 18th century, there is some evidence that Sake was being exported to Europe, through the Dutch East India Company, but it seemed to still be more of a rarity than anything else. 

As for the U.S., the odd Sake container might have shown up as early as the 18th century, an oddity brought in by a merchant, missionary or world traveler, though I'm unaware of any documentary evidence to prove that occurred. 

In wasn't until 1840 or 1841, when the first Japanese may have come to the U.S. According to the Fall River Daily Herald, December 10, 1898, Captain William H. Whitfield, master of the ship John Howland of Fairhaven, Massachusetts, found himself in the Japan Sea when he sighted five Japanese sailors clinging to a rock in the sea. They claimed to have been there for about 70 days, and Captain Whitfield brought the men to Honolulu. Obviously, these shipwrecked Japanese wouldn't have had any Sake after 70 days of survival on that barren rock. 

The youngest of the five was a 15 year old, Nakahama Manjiro, and he wanted to remain on this ship, which Captain Whitfield permitted. The boy, who later was called "John Mun" or "John Mungrove," attended U.S. schools and was an excellent student. He eventually became a naturalized American citizen, probably the first Japanese to receive that distinction. 

However, he was the target of racism. For example, “There was always some prejudice against him, for he was looked upon as a colored lad, and the color line was sharply drawn in those days. When he sought to attend church with Capt. Whitfield, for instance, he was refused permission until he went to the Unitarian,…” Around 1846 or 1847, Manjiro went on a whaling expedition and then headed to San Francisco to mine gold, where he remained for only a few months.

Manjiro wanted to return to Japan, and left Hawaii, with four other native Japanese, despite the fact he would face a death sentence in Japan. Around 1635, Japan passed an edict preventing any Japanese from traveling to a foreign country, upon pain of death. And if a Japanese returned home, after having lived in another country for a time, he too would face execution. However, Majiro was fortunately accepted in Japan, became a samurai, and worked as an interpreter. He also helped to develop the Japanese navy. In 1870, he returned to the U.S. for a brief trip, visiting Massachusetts, and then returned to Japan.  

The first U.S. newspaper reference that I've found concerning Sake was in the Georgetown Advocate (D.C.), March 19, 1842, in an article concerning Japanese customs. The article made some general comments about Japanese beverages, such as, “Every Japanese beverage is drunk warm water included.” The article also stated that, “… poor gin and excellent coin-brandy are drunk; and there is a fermented red juice from the grapes of wild vines; but it is not wine.” 

Sake was mentioned, although it wasn’t described, in a section on Japanese gambling. In one game, a puppet was floated in a vessel of water and bets were taken on which direction it would move. “As it turns, penalties of sakee-drinking are imposed for wrong guesses; and thus the men get drunk with sakee, and sober themselves with tea, as a few folks do elsewhere; but the Japanese outsit us by repeating the two processes—sakee and tea, and tea and sakee, until they are carried away insensible.” 

Finally, the article also mentioned Sake in the context where criminals, who were to be executed, would share Sake and other refreshments with their friends before they were executed. 

A few other newspapers would briefly reference Sake during the 1840s. For example, the Philadelphia Inqurier (PA), November 30, 1847, referenced once again that in some Japanese games, including chess and draughts, the loser had to drink a cup of Sake. The article also claimed, “… they are occasionally so virtuous and so valiant in their submission to the law of the game, that the proud and temperate orientals are carried off by the servants like so many baskets of leavings.” 

However, most Americans probably first heard about Sake in the news when Commodore Matthew C. Perry helped to open Japan up to international trade and diplomacy. In July 1853, Commodore Perry sailed into Uraga Bay, in the Kanagawa Prefecture, with four large warships, two of which were steam frigates. As they released black smoke into the air, and their hulls were painted with a dark sealant, the Japanese referred to these ships as kurofune, the “black ships.” 

The U.S. government had three primary objectives at this time, including establishing trade relations with Japan. They also wanted some protections for American citizens who might be shipwrecked on Japanese shores. Finally, they desired to establish coal depots in Japanese ports, especially as Japan had much coal. 

Commodore Perry made his pitch to the Japanese, and promised to return the next year for their official answer. In February 1854, Perry returned, although with eight war ships this time, a show of force. On March 31, the Kanagawa Treaty was signed, the first formal agreement between Japan and a Western country. This achieved two of America’s objectives, including establishing two coal deports, and creating protections for shipwrecked sailors. It did not establish trade relations though. 

However, in 1858, Consul General Townsend Harris, the first resident American diplomat in Japan, negotiated a formal trade agreement, the U.S.-Japan Treaty of Amity and Commerce. One effect of these treaties with Japan was to start bringing more information about Japanese culture to Americans, including concerning Sake. 

Numerous articles about Perry’s visits to Japan appeared in American newspapers all across the country. For example, the Weekly National Intelligencer, November 5, 1853, which discussed the visits of Commodore Matthew Perry to Japan, mentioned they received "presents of saki and cake." Several other subsequent newspaper articles, concerning Perry's visits to Japan, also mentioned Sake, commonly referring to it as saki

The Philadelphia Inquirer (PA), January 17, 1854, published an article on Japanese wedding customs, noting, “They spend the evening drinking sakee, a wine made from rice, accompanied with numerous and minute formalities,…” The New York Times, June 13, 1854, talking of Perry’s visit, noted, “At a sign given the servants in attendance brought in lacquered stands with tea and saki.” 

The New York Daily Herald, June 27, 1854, was the first article to actually give a basic definition of Sake, rather than a brief mention, stating,“The extract from rice is now the only liquor known in Japan. It is called saki by them. Hence they gave the name of “American saki” to all the drinks. They are fond of ardent spirits. The guests made it a business to taste of every wine and of every dish.”

Cold Sake! The Daily Evening Star (DC), July 24, 1854, in an article on Perry’s expedition, mentioned, “… hot and cold saki, or spirits, being supplied all the while.” This is interesting as it indicates that hot Sake was not the only option at this time, and that some Japanese enjoyed cold Sake too. Hot Sake was far more dominant, but cold Sake still existed.

The Pittsburgh Daily Post, September 13, 1854, mentioned that “The ‘Journal of Commerce’ is showing the vast advantages American commerce is destined to derive from intercourse with the Japanese. Exports from that country, we are told, at present consist of….rice, saki, soy; ..” Thus, it seemed possible that as trade with Japan began, it was possible that Sake could soon be exported to the U.S. And the first Sake shipment to U.S. probably came two years later.

In addition, The Daily Globe (D.C.), October 10, 1854, quoting an article from the New York Tribune, briefly mentioned, “The Japanese make their beer called saki, of rice.” 

The New York Tribune, October 17, 1855, ran an article about marriage ceremonies in Japan, which included the use of Sake. It was said, "The formality of the marriage consists in drinking saki after a peculiar manner. The saki is poured out by two young girls, one of whom is called the male butterfly, and the other the female butterfly — appellations derived from their susu, or saki jugs, each of which is adorned with a paper butterfly. As these insects always fly about in pairs, it is intended to intimate that so the husband and wife ought to be continually together. The male butterfly always pours out the saki to be drank, but before doing so, turns a little to the left, when the female butterfly pours from her jug a little saki into the jug of the other, who then proceeds to pour out for the ceremony. For drinking it three bowls are used, placed on a tray or waiter, one within the other. The bride takes the uppermost, holds it in both hands, while some saki is poured into it, sips a little, three several times, and then hands it to the groom. He drinks three times in like manner, puts the bowl under the third, takes the second, hands it to be filled, drinks out of it three times, and passes it to the bride. She drinks three times, puts the second bowl under the first, takes the third, holds to be filled, drinks three times, and then hands it to the groom, who does the same, and afterwards puts this bowl under the first. This ceremony constitutes the marriage.” It continued, "The saki, with other refreshments interspersed, is then served by the two butterflies to those relations of the married parties in a prescribed order, indicated by the mediator.” 

Harper's New Monthly Magazine, December 1855, published an article about Perry's visit to Japan, and stated, "The native sakee, which is a potent liquor, not unlike whisky, divides with the beverage 'that cheers but not inebriates' the honors of a general appreciation. On the arrival of a guest, he is expected to accept of either tea or sakee, or of both." 

Even before the official trade treaty was made in 1858, some Japanese exports started to make their ways to U.S. shores. Maybe the first Sake shipment to the U.S. came in February 1856. The Sacramento Daily Union, February 18, 1856 indicated the receipt of a shipment of “Forty dozen imperial cordial Saki." No further description was provided, although it seems possible they might have been in jars or wooden tubs. 

The Times-Picayune (LA), March 14, 1856, mentioned that another ship arrived with a delivery of Sake, which is described as, "a liquor in pint jars called Saki which is not at all hard to take. It is like the Dutch maraschino and of the color of cider. It was bought at eighteen cents a jar.” 

However, it seemed that these Sake shipments were uncommon, more of a unique curiosity, that occasionally got imported into the U.S. I didn't find evidence of any regular or large shipments of Sake during this period. 

The Augusta Weekly Constitutionalist (GA), April 23, 1856, in a discussion of Perry’s visit to Japan, described a Japanese feast, where “… the silver vessels which contained the national drink of sakee—a kind of whisky distilled from rice—were kept diligently replenished. The sakee cups are mere thimbles in capacity….but the Japanese have acquired by practice such a facility in filling and emptying them, that they evidently lose nothing for want of larger goblets.” 

Other articles about Perry’s visit also briefly mentioned Sake. The Albany Evening Journal (NY), September 6, 1856, noted that “… in the centre was an earthen pot filled with sakee (the intoxicating drink…).” The Alexandria Gazette (VA), March 14, 1857, noted that “… during the entertainments, warm saki was freely passed around. This saki, which is made from rice, is the national drink, and is very palatable.” The Republican Farmer (CT), November 13, 1857, reported on Perry’s visit to the home of a Japanese mayor, where his wife and sisters generally knelt but, “This position did not seem to interfere with their activity, for they kept running about very briskly with the silver saki kettle, the services of which in consequence of the smallness of the cups, were in constant requisition.” 

Sake theft! The New York Herald (NY), October 30, 1858, reported on over 40 American whalers who landed at the Japanese port of Hakodadi (now Hakodate). It was noted that there were two or three “distilleries” in the port, “… for the manufacture of saki, of which there are two kinds—the strong and the sweet.” Two of the whalers were subsequently imprisoned in Japan, one for stealing Sake, and he was sentenced to one year’s hard labor. 

The Sacramento Daily Union, July 30, 1859, mentioned, “The Japanese are very hospitable, and when you enter their houses not only offer you refreshment, consisting of cake, confectionery, sakee, or tea, but insist upon your taking away with you what you do not eat—a Japanese custom.”

A Sake slushy? The Daily Alta California, January 7, 1860, discussed the region of Fusi-yama Mountain, located near the bay of Yedo in Japan. The article stated, “I am told, at its base, where the traveler can obtaln at the inns a drink of saki, cooled by the snows brought from this lofty summit, and those who have tasted the mixture pronounce it equal to the famed ices of Tortoni, of the boulevard des Italiens, Paris.”

The True Flag (MA), January 21, 1860, published an interesting article on Japanese food, noting, “The saki is a weak and sweetish liquor, made of rice, and is drank both hot and cold. It prevails as a beverage almost as universally as tea. Though often urged, I could never succeed in swallowing more than a sip or two of it, it was so exceedingly insipid and unpleasant to my palate. Others, however, and perhaps better judges of liquor than myself, pronounced it excellent.” Again, we see that some drank cold Sake. 

The California Farmer and Journal of Useful Sciences, March 30, 1860, briefly noted, “The Japanese, however, are fond of liquor, but have the modesty and good sense to drink it in their own houses, and at night.”

In 1860, the shogun sent a delegation of high-ranking officials to the U.S. to ratify the Treaty of Amity and Commerce and meet with American officials, including President James Buchanan. The New York Tribune (NY), May 4, 1860, reported on the arrival of these officials on a U.S. steam ship. They were worried that their Sake might not remain good during their lengthy trip, but the paper noted, “They were satisfied on this point when one of the officers produced some that he had bottled two years ago, and which they declared to be really old particular saki.” 

The Japanese embassy visited Washington, D.C. and the New York Times (NY), May 15, 1860, reported, “... the population is on tiptoe of expectation, in view of the coming delegation from the Empire of the Rising Sun.” The article continued,  “… the devotees of Bacchus reveling in the possible flowing of rivers of ‘sakee’ on honor of the nation’s guests,” 

The New York Semi-Weekly Tribune (NY), May 29, 1860, also discussed this visit, noting that one of the Japanese poured  “a teaspoonful or two of clear red liquor" from a “long bottle.” "This is the ‘Saki,’ or wine of the Japanese. With fitting seriousness the saki rises, approaches the several mouths, and disappears. It well relieves the remembrance if the recent sirooko, for its pungent spice and gentle sweetness recommend themselves very favorably, even to American senses. In more sincerity, this is declared a tranquilizing and cheering draught.” The Richmond Dispatch, May 30, 1860, added, “The Saki, or wine of the Japanese, is of a clear red color, and is drank from very small cups. It has a tranquilizing and cheering effect.” It curious that the Sake was said to be red, as it's usually relatively clear, although this could have been a special Sake that was actually red in color. 


The Evening Post (NY), May 22, 1860, briefly stated, “In Japan intoxication is unknown. Their common drink is saki, a distillation rice, but the Japanese prefer our manufactured liquors to their national beverage,..”  The New Orleans Crescent, July 11, 1860, discussed a small party that occurred before the Japanese delegation left town. It noted, “...every one present became as jolly a good fellow as champagne, sakee and punch could make him.” 

The Pacific Commercial Advertiser (HI), July 26, 1860, printed, “I have never seen but one instance of intoxication among the Japanese; still they are fond of intoxicating liquors, and by the influence of example, and solicitation in respectable and honorable circles, can easily be seduced into the most ruinous habits. Their common and favorite drink is saki, a distillation of rice, which in strength is about equal to old Sherry wine. They easily, however, exchange it for champagne and other wines, and rum, whisky and brandy.” 

A number of newspaper articles would state that the Japanese rarely got drunk, at least in Japan, although other newspaper articles would allege significant problems due to drunk Japanese in the U.S. 

For about six months, from September 1860 to February 1861, there were ads in numerous newspapers for “Paul’s Oriental Saki or Japanese Tonic.” The above advertisement, from the Daily Journal (NC), October 10, 1860, noted that “Paul’s Oriental Saki or Japanese Tonic” was, “The favorite beverage of the tycoon and nobility of Japan, a delicious aromatic wine, medicated with mild and bracing tonics, highly recommended for nervousness, indigestion and invalids generally.” I'll note that "tycoon" was corruption of the Japanese term "Taikun," and referred to the Shogun of Japan. 

The creator of this produce was Stephen Paul and some of the ads simply referred to it as “Japanese Tonic.” Unfortunately, I've been unable to find any more information about this "tonic." I don't know what ingredients were in the tonic, and whether it actually contained Japanese Sake or not. 

The Cincinnati Daily Press, October 27, 1860, mentioned an auction sale of Chinese and Japanese goods, which included, “Rattan-covered saki bottles.” The Baltimore Sun, November 1, 1860, also advertised an auction sale of Japanese goods; including “Sakee Bottles.” The Sun (MD), November 10, 1860, advertised an auction sale of "superb Japanese goods," including "sakee bottles." Though none of these bottles were described, it seems likely they’re refering to tokkuri, typical ceramic flasks used to pour sake. The Polynesian (HI), December 15, 1860, printed an advertisement for a shop that sold Japanese goods, including “Saki cups.” 

Cold Sake once again. The Holmes County Republican (OH), February 28, 1861, discussed a dinner that was held in Japan for some American visitors. It was noted, “Cold saki of two kinds, sweet and acrid, was profusely served towards the close of the feast, …” 

The Church Journal (NY), September 17, 1862, printed a letter from a medical missionary in Japan, which mentioned, “Apopplexy, in its different forms, may be accounted for by the exposure of the shaven skull to a fiery burning sun; by the enormous drafts of saki drunk by many individuals almost every night before retiring (I know a man who was in the habit of drinking about eight pints every night;..” Apoplexy generally referred to a stroke or brain hemorrhage.

The True Flag (MA), October 31, 1863, stated, “Cups of saki, a spirit distilled from rice, are handed round, and some people think it very palatable or potable. It is quite as good (or bad) as the Chinese samshu or wine, however, and very much the same kind of thing.” 

The Daily Alta California, February 17, 1868, printed, “Saki and chow-chow were supplied bountifully by the wealthier classes, and the commonalty had a gleeful holiday. Japanese joy seeks expression, and Saki, like the stronger liquors of civilized nations, is a key which unlocks the tongues of these usually quiet and reserved Asiatics; so that when "the elephant walked around and the band began to play," they filled the air with a song,..” 

Japanese Sake food pairings? The New York Times, July 31, 1868, discussed life in Japan, and the article mentioned, “Saki was brought in. It is slightly alcoholic, and its taste is such as might be expected of a mixture of rum and sherry wine. It is always served hot, and from the tiny cups in use one may drink many a bumper and not feel it. With the saki came, as usual, fried eels, oranges and boiled snails, ..” So, those three items were common accompaniments with Sake, and they certainly are a diverse trio. 

The Sacramento Daily Union (CA), November 25, 1868, discussed a visit to Hiogo (aka Kobe), and described Sake as the "bourbon whisky" of Japan. The article continued, “It is made out of rice, very similar to the manner in which we make whiskey from rye. There are about thirty distilleries in one street, in each of which thousands of gallons of saki are stowed away, not in casks or barrels, but in a sort of bucket or pannier.” The article also presented a negative image of Sake, stating: "Saki is a transparent, yellowish liquid, extremely sharp, extremely intoxicating, and particularly disagreeable and unpleasant to the taste.

During the next 50-60 years, newspapers would vary in their descriptions, some claiming Sake was extremely intoxicating while others stating it was only mildly intoxicating. Some articles also took more of a middle road view. 

The Waterbury Daily American (CT), January 9, 1869, noted, “The stimulating drinks of the Japanese are prepared from rice, and are generally known to foreigners under the name of sakee. They vary much in strength and flavor probably to as great an extent as our own wines. Sakee is generally drink warm. Some kinds resemble the pale sherry in color, and are by no means disagreeable; others are very strong, and their effect is soon seen on the people, numbers of whom are unhappily addicted to drinking—even the women indulging in this vicious habit.” 

More negativity against the Japanese. The Boston Daily Advertiser (MA), July 7, 1869, briefly mentioned, without any supporting evidence, that, “Of the 80,000 inhabitants of Nagasaki, 48,000 get drunk every night on saki, which is Japanese for rice whiskey.” 

************

As a brief diversion, let's take a look at the Japanese-English and English-Japanese Dictionary by James Curtis Hepburn, M.D., LL.D. (2nd edition-1872). He provided a significant list of Sake and drinking related terms, many which I've listed below. It's fascinating to see how many Sake-related terms the Japanese used, such as Sakate, money for buying sake. It's also intriguing to see the term Sasa, which is another word for Sake, but it was used only by women. 

Ama-zake: Sweet sake, a kind of drink made of fermented rice
Atsu-gan: Hot sake
Cho-shi: A metal kettle used for warming sake.
Hiya no sake: Cold sake.
Kan-nabe: A pot for warming sake.
Miki: Sake offered to the Kami
Moromi-zake: A kind of sake, in which the rice-grounds are not separated from the liquid.
Neri-zake: A kind of white sake. 
Nigori-zake: A kind of inferior sake in which the grounds have not been strained off—same as moromi-zake
Saka-bayashi: A green bamboo or flag erected in front of a sake brewery for a sign.
Saka-bitari: A person soaked with sake; a sot, a drunkard
Sake-bukuro: A bag used for straining Sake in breweries.
Sake-bune: a large vat used in making sake
Saka-dai: the price of sake
Saka-daru: a wine-cask, a sake-tub
Sake-gura: A house in which sake is stored.
Saka-hadzure: one at a wine party who avoids drinking
Saka-kabu: a license from the government to produce sake
Saka-kigen: the spirits, or excitement produced by drinking wine
Saka-mori: a wine-party, entertainment, feast, banquet
Sakana: Any kind of food taken with sake; fish
Sakate: money for buying sake, drink-money
Sake-toji: One acquainted with the art of brewing sake, a brewer.
Saka-tsubo: A sake jar, a wine jar.
Sake-unjo: The tax or duty levied by government on the manufacturers of sake.
Saka-ya: A brewery, a shop where sake is sold, a grog-shop.
Sake: A fermented liquor brewed from rice—wo kamosu, to brew sake—ni yo, to be drunk—no uye ga warui hito, one who behaves disorderly because of drink—ni oboreru, to be addicted to drink
Sake-dzuki: one fond of sake, a lover of wine, a toper
Sake-nomi: A drunkard, a wine-bibber, toper
Sasa: Same as sake, used only by women
Sasa-no-ha: A name given to sake, or Japanese ardent spirits.
Shiromma: A kind of inferior Sake, same as Moromi zake.
Shu-ki: The taste, or smell of sake. 

*************

The Jewish Messenger (NY), February 28, 1873, stated, “Japanese dealers in spirits are beginning to brand their saki rubs with various inscriptions, to entire sailors to buy the pernicious stuff they contain. One brand is described as ‘Best brewed saki saved one’s life.” 

From May 1 to November 2, 1873, the Vienna’s World’s Fair was held in Vienna, Austria. Over 7 million people attended this grand event. Japan received an invitation in 1871 to display at the Fair, and they decided to attend, to boost their international reputation and help establish a market for their goods. The Japanese exhibition would display the most important products of the various prefectures, which included Sake, the first time Sake took such a visible international role. 

After this Fair, Japan participated in numerous such international expositions. Japan, and 36 other countries, would exhibit at the 1876 Philadelphia Centennial Exhibition, from May 10 to November 10. Almost 10 million people attended this event, and Japan brought a variety of Sakes for their display.

For the Exhibition, the Japanese Commission published an Official Catalogue of the Japanese Section: And Descriptive Notes on the Industry and Agriculture of Japan. The catalogue stated, “Class 660.—Alcohol and Malt Liquors. ‘Sake’ or, as it is sometimes called, the rice wine, forms the principal and almost the only alcoholic beverage of the country. It is made exclusively of rice. In preparing the ferment the rice is washed, steamed during several hours, and spread out on mats to lower the temperature; afterwards it is kept in a warm room for several days, where it is mixed with a certain quantity of rice covered with fungi; these latter grow rapidly over the whole surface of the rice. The fermenting wort is made of fresh rice, also steamed, and mixed with water and a certain percentage of ferment in small tubs. A large coop is filled with these mixtures, and kept for about eight days at a certain temperature, which is maintained by introducing a vessel filled with hot water into it. The wort first gets' a sour taste, whereupon the temperature is lowered; at a later period the taste becomes bitter, and then the wort is quickly cooled, so as to stop further fermentation. In January the real brewing begins. Again fresh rice is steamed, washed with a considerable percentage of both the ferment and the wort, mixed with a sufficient quantity of water. The whole is then transferred into big vats, frequently stirred, and left for about 20 days, at the expiration of which period it usually acquires a vinous taste. The mash is now placed in bags and pressed; and the liquid runs out into casks, where it settles, whence it is tapped when quite clear. The clear liquid is then heated up to a certain point, and kept in large butts. This sake is generally drunk hot at meals. The residues and the spoiled sake are distilled and the alcoholic liquid used for making the ‘mi-rin,’ or sweet liquor. The total production of ‘sake’ in 1874 is estimated at 6,501,083 hectolitres; that of certain inferior kinds of sake at 127,446 hectolitres; that of brandy at 60,557 hectolitres; and, finally, that of sweet alcohol liquors at 56,712 hectolitres."

The Philadelphia Inquirer, February 2, 1875, mentioned that in China, "They have a kind of wine made from rice, but it is simply 95 percent alcohol, not like the Japanese 'sake' which, though made from rice, too, is very much like sherry." China made "sake" for thousands of years before Japan did, but  it didn't become the hugely popular drink that it eventually become in Japan. 

During this period, the price of rice in the U.S. was considered an obstacle to brewing Sake. Le Meschacebe (LA), July 24, 1875, published an intriguing article on the expense of potentially brewing Sake in the U.S. “Rice, like other grain, can be manufactured into an intoxicating drink, and this is largely done in the different countries of East. In China it goes by the name of shamshoo, and in Japan by the name of saki. In the United States it commands too high a price to be used in that way when other grain is cheaper.” This is probably the first mention anywhere of the potential of Sake brewing in the U.S., although it was thought to be cost-prohibitive.

In addition, with less than 150 Japanese living in the U.S., there was little incentive to brew Sake in the U.S., especially if rice was such a costly ingredient. Importing Sake was cheaper, and only a small amount was needed to satisfy the tiny amount of resident Japanese. Although many Americans might have heard of Sake before, very few probably had tasted it, so there was no market for it. 

For a time, a number of sources wrongfully believed that Sake was distilled, rather than fermented. The St. Louis Republican (MO), October 22, 1876, attempted to correct this error, writing that, “… saki, a fermented liquor manufactured from rice, and in character something between ale and wine. Some writers have fallen into the error of describing saki as a distilled liquor, but we were assured that this is not correct, and that it is made by a process somewhat similar to brewing. It is not disagreeable in flavor, but has a somewhat larger percentage of alcohol than our malt liquors, and exhilarates more quickly. Indeed, in this respect, it is somewhat similar to champagne. It is served hot from small porcelain vases, and it may be said to be the national drink of the Japanese.” 

The Mariposa Gazette, November 24, 1877, published an article about the home life in Japan, stating, “The Japanese usually partake of three meals a day. The noon meal is more substantial than in the early morning, but that at evening, after the labors of the day are over, is the chief. Many spend hours over their evening cups and dishes. At this time probably a majority drink sake in greater or less quantity. The drink is brewed from rice, and contains from two to eight per cent of alcohol.” I suspect the information about the alcohol content is erroneous, as Sake is usually is in the double digits, over 14%.

According to the 1880 census, there were only about 146 Japanese living in the U.S., and 86 of them lived in California, with 63 in San Francisco. Ten years later, the 1890 census found there were 2038 Japanese in the U.S., with 1147 of them living in California.  

The New Ulm Weekly Review (MN), March 2, 1881, published an excerpt from a book review of Unbeaten Tracks in Japan by Isabella Bird, an explorer, naturalist, writer and photographer who had traveled to Japan.  It was noted, “--sake, or rice beer, a straw-colored fluid of a faintish taste and smell, most varieties of which contain from 11 to 17.5 of alcohol.” In addition, the article provided some information on Sake production, mentioning that the Japanese have used pasteurization for hundreds of years. The article continued, “Sake, it seems, ought to have five distinct tastes—sweetness, sourness, sharpness, bitterness and astringency, together with a slight trace of the flavor of fusel oil... It is frequently drunk hot, and, as a rule, is taken before what the Japanese consider the substantial part of the repast.” However, Bird found Sake to be "insipid, sickly and nauseous" and she wasn't much of a fan of Japanese cuisine either. 

The New York Tribune (NY), November 5, 1882, published an interesting, albeit brief, article on the Sake brewing process in their Science For The People column. The article was taken from a paper written by Professor R.W. Atkinson of Tokyo. This seems to indicate an interest in Sake beyond the basic cultural items. 

The Morning Journal & Courier (CT), December 4, 1883, also provided some intriguing information about Sake in Japan. The article mentioned, “…in the center was a laqueur tray containing bottles of saki, the national liquor in Japan, and decorated china cups. This saki is distilled from rice (I judge there is no limit to the number of ways in which the natives utilize rice), and is universally drunk even by the women. It is said that at certain seasons of the year out of every ten men in the island go to bed at night really intoxicated; but the effect is so mild in comparison with that of whiskey in our own country and opium in China that the habit is not very much condemned. At weddings twenty-seven different brands of this saki are served, and to decline to drink is gross discourtesy.” 27 different brands!

Briefly, the Representative (WI), March 29, 1887, mentioned, "The favorite alcoholic beverage of the Japanese is sake. It is distilled from fermented rice, and has a taste resembling whisky."

Then, the Sacramento Daily Union (CA), April 18, 1887, noted, “Rice Beer —The Japanese brew their sake in the following manner: Malt is made from the rice called koji, submitting the clean and shelled grains to steam and rendering them gelatinous in consistence. Cooled down some yeast is added, and the mass is then fermented in a room at 40° celsius, being frequently stirred to let the carbonic acid gas free. This is done in flat tanks which have a steam coil. With the addition of water the mass is fermented during five or six days, and after being filtered is ready for consumption.”

The Los Angeles Herald (CA), August 24, 1887, printed an article about holidays in Japan, stating,  “Buckets, barrels and porcelain jars are everywhere overflowing with new saki, which everybody drinks, and yet to the credit of these people be it said there is little drunkenness.” 

Sake dangers?? The Sacramento Daily Union (CA), September 17, 1887, claimed that Sake was "dangerous from the large proportion of fusil oil contained in it." Fusel oils are found in most alcoholic beverages, but if the levels are too high, they can make people sick. Later information does not seem to indicate that Sake ever had dangerous levels of fusel oils and that this allegation was false.

The Springfield Daily Republic (OH), November 1, 1887, and a number of other newspapers across the country, published an article titled Drinks Of All Nations. The article discussed the drinking habits of numerous countries, from China to the Middle East, though the article was trying to prove the proposition that "The easily governed nations drink no strong liquors." It's an extremely condescending and racist article. For example, it says: "The Japs are the most encouraging examples that the east presents of a nation progressing from Asiatic to a European plane of civilization." 

As for Sake consumption, the article noted: “No nation in Asia drinks so persistently and steadily as do the Japanese. The average Jap consumes about half a pint of sake or rice beer with each meal—a pint and a half per day--saying nothing about further social indulgence in the evening. Both men and women drink sake by the pint daily, and think no harm of it, either.” 

The Rockford Daily Register (IL), December 17, 1887, noted, “A beer distilled from rice and known as ‘saki’ is in general use among them. This saki is prepared for drinking by heating in kettles and is sipped from pretty little bows or cups, the same as is tea.” 

The Healdsburg Tribune, Enterprise and Scimitar (CA), September 1, 1888, mentioned, “While tea and sake flowed freely all were happy, peaceful, friendly, and courteous to one another, the most advanced sake-drinker being only a little redder, a little happier, and giggling a little more steadily than any one else.”

Sake production in Japan, The Iron County Register (MO), February 28, 1889, reported that there were 18,153 Sake breweries in Japan, producing over 140 Million gallons annually, and a population that was less than 38 million. That equates to about 3.7 gallons of Sake per person. 

Sake brewery transformed into a church! The Honolulu Advertiser (HI), June 18, 1889, detailed Reverend E.G. Porter, who gave an address to the Japanese on Sunday evening where “he told them of the wonderful and rapid changes going on in Japan.” He also stated, “When Japanese are converted to Christianity, their conduct shows the sincerity of their faith. One saki distiller turned his distillery into a church and the barrels into seats.” 

The Evening Repository (OH), July 2, 1889, briefly mentioned, “Saki, or rice beer, is produced in Japan to the extent of 150,000,000 gallons annually.” 

Sake consumption leading to red hair? The Pittsburgh Dispatch (PA), November 3, 1889, mentioned once again the intriguing Sake legend, connecting red hair and Sake. “There is a tradition in Japan that the man who drinks too much sake, or Japanese brandy, acquires a redness of hair,..." This legend was also mentioned in The Salt Lake Herald, November 3, 1889 and in April 1896. 

From 1890 to 1900, there was an explosion in growth of Japanese residents in the U.S. The census revealed that the Japanese population had expanded ten times, to a total of 24,326, with 10,151 of them living in California. When Hawaii was included, the total Japanese population rose to 85,437. 

The Watertown Daily Times (NY), January 4, 1890, reported on an incident in January 1877 where a steamer, the City of Peking, found a Japanese junk adrift at sea. The ship belonged to Ha-Rodadi, and was partly loaded with rice and saki (“Japanese whisky”). 

Sake consumption decreasing in Japan. The Evening Bulletin (CA), August 1, 1890, noted that, "A revolution is taking place in the drinking habits of the Japanese. The rice brandy called ‘saki,’ which had long been their national beverage, was being supplanted by beer brewed after the German method. In Osaka, the number of beer saloons had increased from thirteen to almost six hundred in the last four years, while the number of resorts where ‘saki’ was sold has fallen off. Years ago, the Japanese used to drink 130 million gallons of ‘saki’ annually.” 

It was interesting to note that the Sausalito News (CA), January 29, 1892, noted, “Sake drinking, according to a writer in the "American Antiquarian," is one of the great curses of Japan. In 1879, the amount of rice converted into sake amounted to 15,000,000 bushels. Pledges to abstain from the habit are frequent among the picture-offerings in Japanese temples.” However, no additional details were given to explain why it was said to be a curse. 

The Cleveland Leader (OH), April 3, 1892, briefly stated, “Saki is a light sherry, and is distilled from rice, but is more potent than it seems.” Sake was often compared to Sherry, and there are some similarities between the two beverages.

I was fascinated to learn that the first legal Sake brewery in the U.S. was almost established in a very unlikely location: Chicago! Hawaii, California or another West Coast location would have seemed a more logical starting place, but it appears the nature of the person involved trumped location.

In 1883, Jokichi Takamine, a famous Japanese chemist, worked at the Japanese Department of Agriculture & Commerce and concentrated on Sake brewing. His mother's family owned a Sake brewery so that might have been the impetus for his concentration in this field. He wanted to know how koji transformed starches into sugars. In his researches, he eventually found a way to grow koji on wheat bran rather than rice. This ultimately led to the creation of a process to transform starches into sugars, from any grain, that was cheaper and quicker than the usual malting process used by whiskey distillers.

In December 1890, Takamine and his family moved from Japan to Chicago, although in 1891, he would move to Peoria, Illinois. Takamine founded the Takamine Ferment Company, a company which endeavored to produce whiskey with koji rather than malt. This would allegedly make whiskey less expensive to produce. Besides this unique whiskey project, Takamine was soon connected to another intriguing endeavor. 

In the Muncie Evening Press (IN), April 4, 1892, they briefly reported that, “A syndicate of wealthy Japanese are to establish a large ‘sake’ brewery in Chicago, with a capital of $250,000.” That is a huge amount of money, equivalent to almost $8.5 Million today. Such an investment would have created a huge brewery, especially considering that later U.S. Sake breweries would often start with only $50,000 to $100,000. 

The next day,  the Daily Inter Ocean (IL), April 5, 1892, provided much more detail, in an article entitled, "Sake for Chicagoans--Japanese Will at Once Establish a Brewery with an Unpronounceable Name." The article reported, “A letter from Yokohama states that leading Japanese capitalists of that city and a party of Japanese in Chicago are completing the necessary arrangements for the establishment in Chicago of a Japanese sake brewery, with a capital of $250,000. The brewery is to be called ‘Takamine Shurm Jozo Kaisha.’ The President of the company will probably be Takamine Jokichi, ex-chief of the analysis section in the agricultural and chemical department of Tokio Unniversity. About one-half of the necessary capital has been subscribed.” 

The article was incorrect in the name of the proposed brewery, which actually was "Takamine Shurui Jozo Kaisha" (“Takamine Alcoholic Drinks Brewing Company”).  At this time, there were very few, if any, Japanese living in Chicago as Japanese immigration to Chicago generally didn’t start until the later 1890s. So, this brewery would likely be exporting all of their Sake to California and Hawaii, and maybe even Japan, and not producing it for locals.

Two days later, the Pittsburgh Dispatch (PA), April 7, 1892, reprinted this article, though under a better title, "Sake for Chicago People--Japanese Capitalists Organize to Establish a Factory for Their Beverage." The Rochester Daily Republican (IN), April 7, 1892, briefly reported on this matter, adding their own comment, “Sake is probably a temperance drink intended for such visitors to the world’s fair as are prohibitionists, who like to ‘take a little something for the stomachs sake,’ according to scriptural injunction.

However, it was the temperance faction that voiced opposition to the plans for a Sake brewery in Chicago. The Decatur Daily Democrat (IN), April 8, 1892, alleged that this new brewery would be doom for the city. “If the Congress of the United States had the interests of the people at heart this thing would be forbidden before it gets a foot hold, but Congress will do nothing of the kind, no matter how much appealed to unless indeed the patrons and promoters of the ‘great American industry’ of beer making should see their craft is in danger and should step in and forbid it, which is sincerely to be hoped they will. Even Satan inadvertently brings about the overthrow of evil occasionally. This is a case in which the old, oft repeated quotation applies: ‘I hear a lion in the lobby roar, say, Mr. Speaker shall I shut the door and keep him out or, shall I let him in, and trust to luck to get him out again?” Was this a case of racism, or were they opposed to all alcohol?

In support of their fears, they also noted, “Had lager beer been prohibited at its incipiency American today would have been a comparatively temperate country, but that deceitful drink which lures a man on until he has lost control of his will and so blinds him that he does not see his danger, is the gigantic curse of this or any other country where it is used.” This would seem to indicate that their fears concerned all forms of alcohol, though we can't also ignore that there might have been at least a touch of racism as well. A single Sake brewery certainly didn't seem to pose a dire threat, especially as nearly all of it would be exported out of the city.

There was another article about this proposed Sake brewery in the Wilmington Weekly Star (NC), April 15, 1892. It didn't add any additional facts but mentioned that, “From the name and the amount of cash it takes to run it, Japanese beer (which they mean Sake) must be quite a complicated beverage.” 

The last article I located about this proposed Sake brewery was in the Oregonian (IL), April 19, 1892, which reported on the possibility of the sake brewery. They alleged, “The wine is said to be in high favor with the Chicago citizens,..”, referring to Sake as a wine. It was also said that half of the estimated stock, $250,000, had already been paid. Shinize Tetsukichi, a specialist of the agriculture and commerce department, had also been invited to superintend the brewery, and he departed from Japan on March 27. The article also noted, “This may account for the large quantities of rice forwarded to Chicago.” 

I'll note that the name "Shinize Tetsukichi" appears to be incorrect, and it should be "Tetsukichi Shimidzu." The Chicago Chronicle (IL), May 10, 1896, provided his obituary, and it noted that he went to Chicago in 1892 and worked for Takamine. Shimidzu became the director and chief chemist of the Takamine Ferment Company. It also appears he was responsible primarily for the production of whiskey with Takamine's new process, and there was no mention of a proposed Sake brewery in the obituary. 

Unfortunately, for unknown reasons, it seems plans for the brewery never came to fruition. Did the financing fall through? Was the temperance faction successful in preventing the brewery from opening? It seems strange that the fate of this large proposed project wasn't apparently reported in any newspaper. It's possible that due to all the work Takamine was doing with the whiskey industry, that he decided he wouldn't have sufficient time to also operate a Sake brewery. It remains a curious mystery.

It's fascinating to consider what might have happened to the Sake industry in the U.S. if this Sake brewery had started in Chicago. Would Sake have become a more popular drink? Would other cities have decided to create their own Sake breweries to compete with Chicago? 

************
One of the most extensive articles in an American newspapers about Sake appeared in The Cleveland Leader (OH), April 30, 1893, titled “Japan’s National Beverage: A Japanese’s Essay on Saki and the Process of Making It.” This article also appeared in newspapers in other states, such as Connecticut, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, and Minnesota. 

The article began, noting, “In Japan saki was first prepared about twenty-five hundred years ago and presented to the Deity, for it was believed to be sacred.” The article then went into a description of the brewing process. “The process of saki manufacture is systematic, but differs more or less in the different localities. Well cleaned rice is steamed until it gets softened, and then it is cooled; next it is prepared with the same quantity of water and agitated until it becomes past; this past is called ‘moto’ in the Japanese language, the word meaning origin. Koji (a kind of yeast prepared from rice) and about ten times the amount of water are added together to cause fermentation and are let stand for about twenty-five days in the cellar, where only the brewers are allowed, to prevent from spoiling the brewing, for if any other person is permitted to be in he might have taken any kind of things that have sour tastes and odors. When the fermentation is over the residue is separated from the liquor by means of pressing and a filtering machine. The liquor, however, still retains some turbidity, which is to be subsided in large vessels. Thus the clear filtrate is the beverage or saki. From the residue alcohol and vinegar can be prepared. The brewing commences from the winter solstice and continues during a hundred days.” 

The article continued, noting the role of water in the brewing process. “The taste of saki does not depend merely upon the quality of rice, but also on that of the water; therefore, in brewing, the rice and water have to be carefully selected. The water which is usually used for brewing seems to be hard-natured, according to the table of analysis. Of course the saki may be brewed either of hard or soft water, but when it us prepared of the former it has much better quality and flavor than by the latter.” 

It was then mentioned about some of the most dominant brewing areas of Japan. “The principal places for brewing the saki in Japan are Nada, Itami and Nishinomiya, in the province of Settsu. The saki which is brewed in those above places is of the best quality, their amount of annual brewing being nearly six hundred thousand koki (one koku is nearly equal to forty gallons) that is, over a half of the total amount of brewing throughout the empire.” 

Additional information included the following, “The saki contains on the average 13 per cent of alcohol, two-fifths percent of dextrin, and 1 per cent of glucose. The rest is water. It is a yellow, transparent liquid, having naturally a sweet taste and good flavor. It resembles the white wine in color and flavor.” 

The article continued, “The saki can be preserved for many years by heating it up to sixty degrees Centigrade without changing its properties. If the heating be insufficient there is a fear of overfermentation and putrefaction. The price of saki ranges from twenty to forty dollars a koku, according to its quality. The saki among Japanese is consumed in remarkable quantities; as much as beer in Germany.” 

As for Sake consumption, it was noted, “Saki is warmed up to sixty or seventy degrees Centigrade, when it is to be taken, except in ceremonious places; generally it is warmed in porcelain bottles introduced into the hot water, and when it comes to the desired temperature it is brought out to the table to drink with small porcelain cups. The cups generally have at the top of the diameter of about two inches, and they are one inch in height, and the bottles are about the same height as beer bottles, but far thinner, being as small as two and one-half inches in diameter at the bottom and seven inches in height. They are plain white and colored.” 

A typical Sake shop. The San Francisco Call (CA), June 4, 1893, printed an article about the various types of shops in Japan, including a Sake store. Interestingly, the author refers to Sake as a "rice whisky." The article mentions how you can usually identify the shop as it has a branch of cryptomeria or a cluster of cypress outside. Most people buy Sake and take it home with them, though a few will buy a tiny cup of Sake and drink it there. The shelves have wooden tubs of Sake, each marked with a character and picture. You might see the word "Dai" meaning "best" or "first-class," or "Santokusbu," meaning "the three virtues of flavor, strength and purity." It was also noted that sweet Sake, which is allegedly drunk primarily by women and children, especially at some holidays, was often advertised with a painting of Fujiyama, Mount Fuji.

The legend of Saru-zake, "monkey Sake," was explained in the Los Angeles Herald (CA), October 1, 1893. First, the article mentioned that Sake was drunk warm and tasted similar to a mild Sherry. That comparison to Sherry continued to be mentioned in later newspaper articles. It was also claimed that westerners can drink plenty of Sake without getting drunk, while the "vegetarian Japanese" get drunk much easier with Sake. 

The article then discusses a legend that apes first discovered Sake. “Traditions of Kwate Ken place the discovery of sake to the apes that abound in the mountains of that province.  It was said that apes stole rice from some human homes, and took that rice back into the mountains. After devouring some of the rice, they left the remaining rice in the crook of a tree. Later, rains came that soaked the rice and later, when the sun came out, it warmed the rice, starting a fermentation process. Thus, Sake was created. I have read of a similar legend in other sources, concerning other types of alcohol, and the tales usually involve fruit that accidentally ferments into alcohol. This is the first time I have heard the tale where rice is involved. 

The Milwaukee Journal (WI), November 4, 1893, briefly discussed chrysanthemum Sake. Every year in Japan, they held a series of chrysanthemum fetes. “During the fete everybody partakes of ‘saki,’ a drink into which are thrown the petals of the chrysanthemum and which is supposed to make whoever partakes of it safe from danger for the year.” Nowadays, Chrysanthemum Sake is still drunk during such festivals. 

*************

The first Sake cocktail?! The Japanese generally drank their Sake as is, and it wouldn’t be until the 1920s or so that cocktails started to become a thing in Japan. However, in 19th century America, cocktails were prevalent all across the country, and many classic cocktails were invented during this period. 

The Bohemian Club was a famous, elite private club, founded in 1872, in San Francisco. Its membership was initially only journalists, but eventually was expanded to include artists as well as wealthy businessmen, who supported the arts. It’s claimed that the classic cocktail, the Gibson, was invented here. And it might also be the location of the first Sake cocktail. 

The Sun (NY), October 18, 1895, mentioned, “There are not many more Japanese in San Francisco than there are here, said a commercial traveler yesterday, ‘but the people hustle harder after strange gods out there, and so it comes that you can get a saki cocktail at the Bohemian Club any time you want it—or two of ‘em for two bits. Saki is the Japanese national drink, you know; a weak liquor made of rice. It tastes like boiled hay, but they put enough orange bitters into the saki cocktail to hide all the hay taste, and so people drink it—never because they like it, but because it cannot be got anywhere else.” 

The article intimates that this was the first known Sake cocktail, unavailable anywhere outside of the Bohemian club. The article also doesn’t seem to provide the entire list of ingredients for the cocktail, which was likely more than just Sake and orange bitters. They also painted an unflattering picture of Sake, stating it tasted like “boiled hay.” 

At this time, there probably weren’t any Japanese members in the elite Bohemian Club. Whichever bartender chose to use Sake in a cocktail likely was aware of the Japanese beverage and decided to use it as an “exotic” ingredient. And if the article is to be believed, the members drank it only because it was unique, and not because of its taste. 

************

Please check out information on my Research & Sources for this article. 

(The original version of this article was first posted in April 2015, and has seen multiple expansions and revisions over the years due to additional research. Most recently, during 2024, I've added a significant expansion to this article. I've also chosen to break up the lengthy article into four Parts, to make it easier to read and handle. The total length of the full article is now about 50,000 words. Additional research is certainly warranted and there will continue to be additional expansions and revisions in the future.)

Monday, October 21, 2024

Rant: DON'T DRINK & DRIVE.....OR ELSE!

It's that time of the year again, the holiday season, from Halloween to New Year's Eve. Nearly all of you will probably attend multiple holiday parties this season. I know that I'll be at a number of different parties, celebrating with family and friends. 

Now, it couldn't be any simpler so please listen carefully. This is one of the most important pieces of advice you'll receive this holiday season. Please, please, please give this your full attention! 

If you've had too much alcohol to drink, if there's any, absolutely any, doubt in your mind, don't drive. Just don't do it! Any questions? 

Once again, as an annual post, I step forward with probably my most important Rant of the Year. It's an absolutely vital issue for everyone who enjoys alcohol of any type, from wine to beer, from Scotch to hard cider. With the imminent advent of the holiday season we reach a potentially dangerous period for those people who over indulge, who drink too much at parties, feasts and gatherings. There is nothing wrong with that, and you can drink as much as you desire, as long as you give up your keys to someone who is sober, and you do not drive. 

As I've said multiple times before, and which I'll repeat year after year, "If there is any question, no matter how small, whether you are too intoxicated to drive, then don't. If your family or friends think you have had too much to drink, don't drive. Just don't. It is not worth the risk by any calculation." Err on the side of caution so that if you have any doubt of your capacity to drive, then please do not drive. Take a taxi or Uber, catch a ride with someone else, walk or sleep it off. Just don't drive! 

Rationally, we all know the dangers of drinking and driving. We endanger our own lives as well as the lives of others. Every year, we hear multiple news reports about terrible auto accidents, some with fatalities, that occur because a driver was intoxicated. Families are torn apart, lives are ruined, and much more. Why don't we learn from all these incidents? Even if you don't get in an accident, you might get arrested for drunk driving, with all the attendant high costs, and not just economic. You might even end up in jail. 

About 17,000 people are arrested for drunk driving in Massachusetts each year. That is a huge figure, showing that far too many people still don't understand that they should not drink and drive. Did you know that if you only had two drinks in a hour, you might still have a blood alcohol level over the legal limit? How difficult is it to understand? DON'T DRINK & DRIVE! I'm sure drunk driving incidents in other states are just as significant. 

As a more sobering statistic, 13,524 people (including over 280 children) in the U.S. were killed in drunk driving accidents in 2022, a slight increase from the prior year's fatalities of 13,384. Such deaths shouldn't increase at all, and it's obviously there are far too many deaths. It needs to be change and change now. Back in 2007, there had been a historical high of 13,041 drunk driving fatalities, and the number of fatalities had been decreasing until 2020. And then, there was a 14% increase in 2021. 

The statistics are going the wrong way! More people are dying because of drunk drivers and that needs to stop. Each time you drink and drive, you endanger yourself, your passengers, pedestrians, cyclists, and people in other vehicles. Let someone else drive you, whether it be a friend or family. Take an Uber or public transportation. Leave your car where it is parked as you can always pick it up the next day. You have plenty of options so there is absolutely no reason to drink and drive. Be responsible. 

I don't want to lose any family or friends this year due to a drunk driving accident. I don't think anyone wants to lose their loved ones either. Your family and friends would rather you didn't drink and drive as they don't you to die in a terrible drunk driving accident. So please just don't! 

Monday, November 20, 2023

Rant: DON'T DRINK & DRIVE.....OR ELSE!

It couldn't be any simpler so listen carefully. This is one of the most important pieces of advice you will receive this season. Please, please, please give this your full attention. 

If you've had too much alcohol to drink, if there's any, absolutely any, doubt in your mind, don't drive. Just don't do it! Any questions? 

Once again, as an annual post, I step forward with probably my most important Rant of the Year. It's an absolutely vital issue for everyone who enjoys alcohol of any type, from wine to beer, from Scotch to hard cider. With the imminent advent of the holiday season we reach a potentially dangerous period for those people who over indulge, who drink too much at parties, feasts and gatherings. There is nothing wrong with that, and you can drink as much as you desire, as long as you give up your keys to someone who is sober, and you do not drive. 

As I've said multiple times before, and which I'll repeat year after year, "If there is any question, no matter how small, whether you are too intoxicated to drive, then don't. If your family or friends think you have had too much to drink, don't drive. Just don't. It is not worth the risk by any calculation." Err on the side of caution so that if you have any doubt of your capacity to drive, then please do not drive. Take a taxi or Uber, catch a ride with someone else, walk or sleep it off. Just don't drive! 

Rationally, we all know the dangers of drinking and driving. We endanger our own lives as well as the lives of others. Every year, we hear multiple news reports about terrible auto accidents, some with fatalities, that occur because a driver was intoxicated. Families are torn apart, lives are ruined, and much more. Why don't we learn from all these incidents? Even if you don't get in an accident, you might get arrested for drunk driving, with all the attendant high costs, and not just economic. You might even end up in jail. 

About 17,000 people are arrested for drunk driving in Massachusetts each year. That is a huge figure, showing that far too many people still don't understand that they should not drink and drive. Did you know that if you only had two drinks in a hour, you might still have a blood alcohol level over the legal limit? How difficult is it to understand? DON'T DRINK & DRIVE! I'm sure drunk driving incidents in other states are just as significant. 

As a more sobering statistic, 13,384 people in the U.S. were killed in drunk driving accidents in 2021, a 14% increase from the prior year. Such deaths shouldn't be increasing, and it's obviously there are far too many deaths. It needs to be change and change now. Back in 2007, there had been a historical high of 13,041 drunk driving fatalities, and the number of fatalities had been decreasing until 2020. And then, there was a 14% increase in 2021. 

The statistics are going the wrong way! More people are dying because of drunk drivers and that needs to stop. Each time you drink and drive, you endanger yourself, your passengers, pedestrians, cyclists, and people in other vehicles. Let someone else drive you, whether it be a friend or family. Take an Uber or public transportation. Leave your car where it is parked as you can always pick it up the next day. You have plenty of options so there is absolutely no reason to drink and drive. Be responsible. 

I don't want to lose any family or friends this year due to a drunk driving accident. I don't think anyone wants to lose their loved ones either. Your family and friends would rather you didn't drink and drive as they don't you to die in a terrible drunk driving accident. So please just don't! 

Monday, November 7, 2022

Rant: DON"T DRINK & DRIVE.....OR ELSE!

It couldn't be any simpler so listen carefully. This is one of the most important pieces of advice you will receive this season. Please, please, please give this your full attention. 

If you've had too much alcohol to drink, if there's any, absolutely any doubt in your mind, don't drive. Just don't do it! Any questions? 

Once again, as an annual post, I step forward with probably my most important Rant of the Year. It's an absolutely vital issue for everyone who enjoys alcohol of any type, from wine to beer, from Scotch to hard cider. With the imminent advent of the holiday season we reach a potentially dangerous period for those people who over indulge, who drink too much at parties, feasts and gatherings. There is nothing wrong with that, and you can drink as much as you desire, as long as you give up your keys to someone who is sober, and you do not drive. 

As I've said multiple times before, and which I'll repeat year after year, "If there is any question, no matter how small, whether you are too intoxicated to drive, then don't. If your family or friends think you have had too much to drink, don't drive. Just don't. It is not worth the risk by any calculation." Err on the side of caution so that if you have any doubt of your capacity to drive, then please do not drive. Take a taxi or Uber, catch a ride with someone else, walk or sleep it off. Just don't drive! 

Rationally, we all know the dangers of drinking and driving. We endanger our own lives as well as the lives of others. Every year, we hear multiple news reports about terrible auto accidents, some with fatalities, that occur because a driver was intoxicated. Families are torn apart, lives are ruined, and much more. Why don't we learn from all these incidents? Even if you don't get in an accident, you might get arrested for drunk driving, with all the attendant high costs, and not just economic. You might even end up in jail. 

About 17,000 people are arrested for drunk driving in Massachusetts each year. That is a huge figure, showing that far too many people still don't understand that they should not drink and drive. Did you know that if you only had two drinks in a hour, you might still have a blood alcohol level over the legal limit? How difficult is it to understand? DON'T DRINK & DRIVE! I'm sure drunk driving incidents in other states are just as significant. 

As a more sobering statistic, 11,654 people were killed in drunk driving accidents in 2020. That was an increase of more than 1,500 deaths compared to 2019. Such deaths shouldn't be increasing, and it's obviously there are far too many deaths. It needs to be change and change now. Since 2007, when there was a high of 13,041 drunk driving fatalities, the number of fatalities had been decreasing, but 2020 saw an unsettling increase. 

Each time you drink and drive, you endanger yourself, your passengers, pedestrians, cyclists, and people in other vehicles. Let someone else drive you, whether it be a friend or family. Take an Uber or public transportation. Leave your car where it is parked as you can always pick it up the next day. You have plenty of options so there is absolutely no reason to drink and drive. Be responsible. 

I don't want to lose any family or friends this year due to a drunk driving accident. I don't think anyone wants to lose their loved ones either. Your family and friends would rather you didn't drink and drive as they don't you to die in a terrible drunk driving accident. So please just don't! 

Monday, July 5, 2021

Moonshine? A History of Sotol in the U.S. (A New Edition)

"More than 75% of the population of Mexico may be illiterate. Educational methods in Mexico follow more closely cock-fighting, sotol drinking, and the bull ring rather than the "three R's."
--Omaha Daily Bee, March 26, 1914: A letter to the editor written by Wood B. Wright

This racist comment is interesting for one aspect, that it mentions Sotol drinking rather than Mezcal or Tequila. Today, when discussing Mexico, most people would first mention Tequila and then maybe Mezcal. Very few people though would mention or even know about Sotol. However, back in the early 20th century, Sotol was apparently much more dominant in the northern region of Mexico and Americans on the borders were more familiar with it. Sotol has since been eclipsed by Tequila and Mezcal, but it's starting to make a comeback and you should learn more about it.

The Sotol plant (Dasylirion wheeleri), also known as the Desert Spoon, derives its name from the Nahuatl word “Tzotolin,” which basically translates as “palm with long and thin leaves.” It was once thought to be a type of Agave but it was eventually discovered that it actually is a succulent that belongs in the Nolinaceae family. Both the Agave and Nolinaceae families fall under the same plant order, Asparagales, so they are related to a degree. Sotol grows in northern Mexico and ranges into the U.S., primarily in Texas, Arizona and New Mexico.

Indigenous peoples have been using the Sotol plant for thousands of years, for a number of different purposes. They use the strong fibers of the leaves to make cords and weave baskets. The base of the leaf has been used to make a spoon-like utensil, which led to the Sotol being called the Desert Spoon. The core of the plant has been used as a food source, and some peoples also fermented the plant to make alcohol.

Once distillation was introduced to Mexico, people began to distill the Sotol plant, creating an alcoholic spirit that also was named Sotol. Sotol is primarily produced in the northern Mexican regions of Chihuahua, Coahuila and Durango, though it can be found in other Mexican regions as well. In 2004, Mexico granted Sotol a Designation of Origin (DO) and formed a Consejo Mexicano de Sotol to regulate its production. Legally, Sotol can only be produced in the states of ChihuahuaCoahuila and Durango.  Generally the producers uses wild Sotol plants, which commonly take about fifteen years to mature, and it is said that one plant can produce a single bottle of Sotol.

In Texas, a new Sotol distillery, Desert Door, has opened to the public, raising the issue of whether there is a history of Sotol distillation in the U.S. There appears to be some anecdotal evidence, stories passed down from family members, that Sotol might have been illegally distilled, a form of moonshine, in Texas. It certainly seems plausible that it might have occurred but it would be even more interesting if we could find some documentary evidence to support the belief. In addition, there is the question as to whether Sotol was ever commercially produced in the U.S. or not.

A year ago, my continued research found some historic evidence of Texans illegally producing "moonshine" using Sotol. In addition, I've found a legal rationale for why the commercial production of Sotol, as a spirit for consumption, was illegal and thus apparently never occurred in Texas or any other part of the U.S. in the past. The laws were eventually revised, allowing Sotol production to now occur, but during the 19th and much of the 20th century, it was prohibited.

However, additional research has indicated there actually was a single legal distillery in El Paso, Texas, which commercially produced Sotol. The distillery lasted for only a couple years, closing a short time before the start of Prohibition in Texas. There are still questions about this distillery, especially how it was allowed to legally produce Sotol when the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue had previously declared Sotol and Mezcal production to be illegal

One of the earliest documents I found, with substantial information on Sotol, was in The American Naturalist Vol. 15, No. 11, Nov., 1881, an article titled "Sotol" by Dr. V. Harvard, a U.S. Army Surgeon who was stationed at Fort Abraham Lincoln in North Dakota. Dr. Harvard noted that the production of Sotol "... is carried on mostly in the Mexican States of Chihuahua, Cohuihuila and Sonora, and sotol mescal is the ordinary alcoholic beverage of the native population. It is precluded in Texas by the high duties laid on this class of industry." Dr. Harvard doesn't indicate that any "sotol mescal" is produced in Texas, or elsewhere in the U.S.

Dr. Harvard then goes into a detailed explanation of "sotol mescal," from its harvest to a description of the heads, noting harvesting is suspended only during the rainy reason, from June to September. He also notes how the heads are baked in circular pits, which are about ten feet deep, before they are pounded into a pulp. This sounds similar in some respects to the production of Mezcal. However, the pulp is then thrown into vats for fermentation, and for a few days, men tread upon the pulp with their feet. That foot-treading generally doesn't occur when making Mezcal. Once fermentation is complete, it is then placed into a still. "The first liquor obtained, being richer in alcohol and possessing to a higher degree the peculiar aroma of sotol mescal, is considered of better quality."

Dr. Harvard provides some information on the pricing of "sotol mescal" too. "A vinata in good running order will turn out a Mexican barrel a day (about twenty-eight gallons), sold at an average price of fifteen dollars, and retailing for thirty or forty centsaquart." He also is appreciative of its taste, "Sotol mescal is a pure, wholesome alcoholic drink; if the best brand be kept long enough to lose its sharp edge, it compares favorably with good whisky;.." And another benefit is "On account of its cheapness and characteristic taste, mescal is very seldom adulterated." This is a fascinating article and you should read it for even more information on Sotol.

In some subsequent written references, Sotol in Texas and New Mexico is mentioned as animal feed, with no reference to distillation. A Colorado newspaper, Walsenburg World, June 12, 1892 wrote that in the Pacos river valley of Texas, they are using a "peculiar" sheep feed called Sotol, noting that men with axes must first cut open the Sotol heads and that the sheep are quite fond of the Sotol.

The Santa Fe Daily New Mexican, April 02, 1895, in an article titled "Live Stock Interests," wrote "Attention is now being directed to the nutritive and fattening qualities of sotol, a vegetable growth of the cacti species. Sotol is said by stockmen, who have closely studied its virtues as a stock food, to furnish both feed and water, as it contains sufficient moisture supply stock for long periods without water. Sheep readily fatten on it while cattle and horses take to it as they do to grain. It is not available for sheep unless burst open with an ax." So we see Sotol being used as feed for sheep, cattle and horses, but there isn't any mention that anyone locally is distilling it into alcohol.

There are a number of other newspaper articles during this time frame which discuss feeding sotol to animals, especially sheep, and I haven't added many of them as the information would be duplicative of what I've already mentioned. In none of those articles will you find references to Texans distilling Sotol alcohol.

Mezcal distilleries in Texas? The Laredo Times, May 5, 1903, published an article, Mezcal And This Country, subtitled Why It Can Not Be Distilled In The United States. The article was in response to a question as why no one had ever started a Mezcal distillery, using the abundant maguey that grew in the U.S. Beyond its connection of Mezcal, the answer to this question has important ramifications concernng the production of Sotol, providing a definitive explanation for why no one could commercially produce Sotol liquor at that time.

The answer was provided by the law, in two related statutes. Section 3248 of the Revised Statutes of the U.S. defined "distilled spirits" as "spirits, alcohol, and alcoholic spirit, to be that substance known as ethyl alcohol, hydrated oxide of ethyl, or spirit of wine, which is produced by the fermentation of grain, starch, molasses or sugar, including all dilutions and mixtures of this substance." Section 3255 of the Revised Statutes then allowed the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue to exempt a specific list of fruits, including apples, peaches, grapes, pears, pineapples, oranges, apricots, berries, prunes, figs, and cherries, used to make brandy, from the regulations of the manufacturing of spirits.

Based on these two Sections, the Commissioner had ruled that "the articles and fruits mentioned in the statues above quoted are the only ones which can be used for the purpose of distilling alcoholic liquors..." Because Sotol and Maguey were not specifically mentioned in these statues, then neither could be legally distilled to produce alcohol. Thus, no one could operate a legal Sotol distillery in Texas, or anywhere else in the U.S. Quite a definitive answer.

I've been unable to find any information that the Commissioner of the IRS changed his decision prior to Prohibition. 

The article also briefly mentioned that about two years ago, a man established an illegal distillery in West Texas, and had produced about 600 gallons of "mezcal" from Sotol. However, the government somehow learned of the operation, and subsequently seized and destroyed the still and illegal Sotol "moonshine." So, we also see evidence of illegal distillation in Texas.

Subsequent references to Sotol being distilled for alcohol aren't quite what you think. The Brownsville Daily Herald, October 12, 1906, in an article titled "And Ozona Is Advertised," reports that: "Another gold mine has been discovered in Texas, namely, the vast quantities of alcohol contained in the sotol bush. At Ozone, in Crockett county, the light and ice company is making its own fuel from the sotol and this same company proposes to supply fuel for power to all the surrounding country from its distilling plant." Again, there is no mention that anyone in Texas was distilling Sotol for alcohol consumption.

There were additional references to the plans to use Sotol for fuel. The Jimplecute, October 13, 1906 mentions "San Antonio: John Young of Ozona, who is at the head of the company that proposes to distill denatured alcohol known at (sic) "sotol," is in this city and has shed some new light on the proposed enterprise. He says that sotol plant has somewhat the appearance of a cabbage and grows in great abundance all over West Texas. For many years the Mexicans have manufactured mescal from the plant, producing a good grade of alcohol." Though it mentions Mexicans making alcohol from Sotol, there continued to be a lack of mention of any Texans doing the same.

The San Angelo Press, October 18, 1906 added more detail, stating that the denatured alcohol would replace fuel oil in machinery plants, also stating that: "Other good uses have been made of sotol, however. Sheepmen in the sotol section have long utilized it as the chief food during the winter for their flocks." And once again, despite referencing other uses for Sotol, there wasn't any mention of Texans making alcohol from Sotol.

Another such reference was in the El Paso Herald, June 18, 1907. which printed that "Within six months there will be completed and in operation in El Paso a plant for the extraction of alcohol, ether and fiber from all forms of the cactus plant. This concern will be known as the El Paso Chemical and Fiber Works..." The plant, which was planned to be in an adobe building, would cost $20,000 and have a capacity of 20 gallons a day. "The alcohol will be denatured alcohol, therefore usable for fuel." Though the article claimed this would be the first plant of its kind in the U.S., the earlier references provided here seemed to indicate there was at least one other plant prior to this planned El Paso plant.

As for the continued use of Sotol as feed, the Albuquerque Evening Citizen, July 03, 1907 published an article, Alfalfa versus Sotol for Cattle, discussing a report prepared by a New Mexico agricultural experiment station that conducted a study of the use of Alfalfa vs Sotol. Though they found that Sotol was generally cheaper than Alfalfa, commonly by as much as half, they also concluded that Alfalfa was generally better nutritionally for the animals unless additional ingredients were added to the Sotol feed. In the end, it came down to how inexpensive a farmer could obtain Sotol and the other ingredients as compared to Alfalfa.

Returning to the El Paso plant, the El Paso Herald, August 12, 1907, indicated the factory would be constructed on three blocks in the Grandview Addition. The plans for the building hadn't been completed yet and construction wouldn't begin until those plans were complete. There was a follow-up in the El Paso Herald, October 30, 1907, indicating that the main building, the distillery, was nearly completed. A four-room cottage and stable had also been completed, and they were still working on finishing the fiber building and a bonded warehouse. The plant was supposed to begin operation on January 1, 1908, with a capacity of 1,000 gallons of alcohol, far greater than originally planned.

Plans didn't work out as expected. The El Paso Herald, May 1, 1908, reported that the factory hadn't opened yet, awaiting government authorization for their alcohol distillery, but would open their fiber factory on May 4. Then, the El Paso Herald, July 29, 1908, discussed the imminent start of the distillery, noting that they had already conducted a test run. 

A few changes were made to the process due to findings from that test. They also learned that the "heart of the cactus...after the fibrous blades had been cut off, was a juicy pulp easily converted into alcohol of a very superior quality." In addition, they decided that they would produce only about 500 gallons per day, finding it more beneficial than trying to reach 1,000 gallons. On August 26, 1908, it was announced that the plant needed up to another two weeks before it could finally start production.

Some general information about Sotol, and a short bit about the proposed El Paso plant, was provided in The Buffalo Sunday Morning News, Sept. 27, 1908The article first mentioned how there are millions of acres of Sotol plants in the mountainous area of Western Texas, and that it's said not to grow anywhere else in the U.S. Second, it stated that the Sotol plant can yield a percentage of alcohol greater than any other plant. Third, it mentioned how Congress authorized the construction of a plant to produce denatured alcohol from Sotol, which refers to the El Paso Chemical and Fiber Company.

Fourth, and most interesting, there was a brief historical item, mentioning that when the Spanish came to this area, they found that the "Pueblo and other Indian tribes" already knew of the alcoholic potential of Sotol. They were already using primitive stills to distill a "fiery white liquor." It was also mentioned that Sotol was still a favorite drink of the Mexicans, and that "American cowboys" on the border ranches were familiar with Sotol as well. For example, drinking Sotol was considered one part of the initiation rituals for "tenderfoots" on these ranches. However, there wasn't any mention that anyone in Texas was distilling Sotol.

There were more problems at the El Paso plant in October. The El Paso Herald, October 12, 1908, reported that there had been difficulty in getting alcohol from the product, although they weren't having any problems getting tequila. They wanted to bring in a master distiller for assistance. The November 16, 1908 issue noted the company was still having problems getting denatured alcohol from the yucca plant and they would run the plant for 90 days under the auspices of a distillery expert. Obviously, the plant had significant problems and The Houston Post, October 1909, noted the El Paso Chemical company had gone into receivership. It apparently never commercially produced Sotol for drinking purposes, and even had extreme difficulty in making denatured alcohol for fuel.

The Bulletin of Agricultural Experiment Station, New Mexico College of Agriculture and Mechanic Arts, Issues 72, August 1909, printed an extended article about denatured alcohol, as well as discussing the El Paso Chemical plant. "In this investigation we will also include a study of the alcohol obtainable from the sotol and lechuguilla, the two plants that the El Paso Chemical and Fiber Company made an unsuccessful attempt to ferment for alcohol production. About a year ago this company erected a factory in El Paso. Texas, at a cost of something over $40,000 for the production of denatured alcohol, but for very evident reasons the plant was in operation only a short time."

The article continued, "El Paso plant was able to produce small quantities of fermentable sugar, would seem to indicate that the high steam pressure of the autoclave must have hydrolyzed some sugars without the presence of any mineral acid. It was not sufficient, however, to place the production of alcohol from these plants on an economical basis, and the factory soon closed its doors." It is clear this distillery was only trying to produce denatured alcohol, and even that was ultimately unsuccessful.

During this time period, smuggling Sotol across the border, from Mexico into the U.S., was a problem and there were multiple references in various newspapers about people being caught smuggling. For example, in the El Paso Herald, August 04, 1910, there was a report of a Mexican smuggler trying to discard his contraband Sotol, "the Mexican booze," before he was apprehended by the border authorities. In none of these references was there any indication that Americans were distilling their own Sotol.

In the Bryan Daily Eagle And Pilot, May 08, 1911 there was a brief mention of Sotol: "Then there are the sotol and the maguey and other desert plants, which the Mexican well knows how to convert into either food or drink." Once again, Sotol distillation seemed restricted to Mexico and there was no mention of it occurring in the U.S.

Some companies were starting to use Maguey and Sotol to produce alcohol, although not for comsumption. The News Journal (DE), December 20, 1913, reported that the Cactus Alcohol Co., incorporated in Delaware with a capital stock of $250,000, was formed to engage in the extraction or distillation of alcohol and other products from cactus.

As a follow-up, the El Paso Herald Post (TX), March 16, 1914, indicated, “The Cactus Alcohol company will be in operation in El Paso in 60 days, tuning out denatured and the regular kind of alcohol, and fiber articles of various kinds.Dr. Frank T. Thatcher, of El Paso, was the president and general manager while L.M. Stiles, also of El Paso, was the vice-president and treasurer. Some of the other investors in this corporation were from outside of El Paso, although no other details on them was provided.

The Cactus Alcohol Co. didn't do well, so it was reorganized, becoming a different company, with the objective of producing spirits for public consumption. The Austin American-Statesman (TX), April 22, 1916, reported that the Cactus Fiber and Reduction Company of El Paso has been incorporated, with a capital stock of $18,500. The incorporators included: Gunther R. Lessing, Oscar L. Bowen, and Jose D. Madero. And then the San Antonio Light, November 10, 1916, noted the corporation had increased its capital from $18,500 to $30,000.

The company seems to have started selling their spirits in early 1917, and the first advertisement I found for it was in the El Paso Times (TX), February 9, 1917. The ad mentioned it was for "Cactus Mezcal," distilled in El Paso under Government inspection. It also mentioned that Mezcal is "a preventative and remedy for tuberculosis and kidney troubles." In addition, the ad stated it was "Genuine Mexican Mezcal." The company's office was at 511 East San Antonio Street and that the distillery was located at the Grandview Addition, Blocks 112-114. Based on this ad, it would seem the company was only producing Mezcal from agave, but that turned out not to be the case.

The Spanish edition of the El Paso Times (TX), February 9, 1917, presented a similar advertisement, except there were some intriguing differences as well. Rather than a heading of Cactus Mezcal, this ad was headed by Mezcales Mexicanos. The ad also indicated they had managed to produce for the first time in the U.S. a Mexican Mezcal. Curiously, their first label was "Sotol Fino," which was said to have an exquisite taste, delicate aroma, and unbeatable quality and purity. 

However, there appears to be some confusion as to whether Mezcal and Sotol were two different spirits. Were they actually making Mezcal or Sotol? With the Sotol plant on the label, and the words "Sotol Fino" on the bottle neck, it seems that they were producing Sotol and not Mezcal. Why didn't the English advertisement mention Sotol?  

Finally, the Spanish ad mentioned that in the future, the company would be producing Tequila and Bacanora, but they would be importing the maguey from Mexico. 

A better photograph of the bottle and labels can be found in El Paso Prescription Bottles, the Drug Stores That Used Them and Other Non-Beverage Bottles (2015) by Bill Lockhart, a privately published work. In Chapter 8, p.191, there is a color photograph of the labels from an Ebay listing. It clearly shows a Sotol plant in the lower right of the main label, along with a Mexican flag, eagle and medal. The top label states, "Sotol Fino."

The El Paso Times (TX), March 6, 1917, presented a brief ad for the company, stating: “America First. Try ‘Mezcal Mexicano.’ Not Mexican stuff, but real, genuine ‘Mezcal,’ manufactured in America. Cactus Fiber & Reduction Co., El Paso, Tex.”

The El Paso Times (TX), March 6, 1917, also had another ad, where the Cactus Fiber & Reduction Co., offered to Cattlemen to clean their pastures and grazing fields of all "Agane Cactus (Maguey)," which gives them no benefit and can hurt their cattle. So, if the company was acquiring all this Maguey, were they then also making Mezcal, and not just Sotol?  

There was another ad in the El Paso Times (TX), March 8, 1917, which referred to the product as "new American Brandy. Bottled under bond in America." It also stated it was available in hotels, cafes and "in the better places." The Spanish edition of this issue was similar, but noted it was produced from the finest Sotol.

A Spanish ad in the La Prensa, April 3, 1917, noted that the Mezcal Mexicano was the "salvation" of those afflicted with tuberculosis. The first ad of the Cactus Fiber & Reduction Co. had also mentioned how it helped against this disease. The ad also stated, “Este elixir de la vida aleja para siempre la turberculosis, los resfrios, toses, etc" which can be translated as "This elixir of life forever drives away turberculosis, colds, coughs, etc." We also see that this spirit had ranged beyond El Paso and was now available in San Antonio as well.

Sotol cocktails? The El Paso Times (TX), May 6, 1917, had an ad for Mezcal Fizz, sold at all saloons, and using the spirit from Cactus Fiber & Reduction Co. Even though it's called a Mezcal Fizz, it would actually be a Sotol Fizz. And this might be the first reference to a Sotol cocktail in the U.S.  

Another Sotol cocktail. In El Paso Times (TX), May 13, 1917,  there was a similar ad but for a Mezcal Rickey, which again is really a Sotol Rickey.  

The La Prensa (TX), May 27, 1917, printed another advertisement, from J.F. Lozano & Co., the exclusive agent for the Cactus Fiber & Reduction Co., which was said to be the only Mexican Mezcal distillery in the U.S.

These advertisements continued to appear in the newspapers through June 1917, but vanished after that month. Did the company stop selling their Sotol? The company was apparently still in business as there were a couple mentions of it in August 1917. The El Paso Herald, August 2, 1917, briefly noted that the Cactus Fiber and Reduction Co. had been granted a petition for a sewer connection. The El Paso Herald, August 23, 1917, had a Help Wanted ad for an “Expert boiler erector” for the Cactus Fiber Co.

The El Paso Times, November 13, 1918, then reported that the Cactus Fiber & Reduction Co. would "shortly liquidate its business” and offer for sale its location and factory.  

The resolution of the fate of the company was detailed in the El Paso Times, November 21, 1920. The article stated that “.., the plant once built in El Paso for extracting the sap of the cactus for commercial purposes is being moved back to its native land—Mexico.” When the Cactus Alcohol company was reorganized, becoming the Cactus Fiber & Reduction company, Francisco Arredondo Cepada of Mexico became one of its vice presidents. It was noted that, “With Mexican initiative and exclusive knowledge of vintage and its processes of manufacture, the industry has persistently failed to pay dividends in El Paso, so that Cepada is having the machinery shipped to his properties in Cuetro Cienegas, Coahuila.” In Mexico, they planned to use the machinery to distill their own maguey spirits.  

An article in The Houston Post, March 26, 1917, discussed moonshine operations in Texas. "Of course there have been in Texas the moonshine distilleries which were so common in more eastern states...Be that as it may, distilleries, legal or illegal, have never been a success in this state." This section only mentioned Texan's difficulties in making whiskey from corn.

The article then printed, "At this time only one distillery of any kind, so far as known to the officials, is operating in Texas. This prosperous concern is located in El Paso. It supplies to the Mexicans of that city and contiguous territory their natural drink, mescal, which is distilled from sotol." This distillery was not named, and no other identifying information was provided. 

Previously, I thought this article might have been in error, but the additional research clearly indicates they had to be referring to the Cactus Fiber & Reduction Co. However, it doesn't seem the company was actually prosperous, but this article seems to make it clear they were producing sotol, although it was also referred to as mescal still. 

Back to Sotol as animal feed. The use of Sotol for animal feed took a technological step forward as reported in El Paso Herald, July 04, 1917. A new company was formed in El Paso, Sotol Products, to produce feed for livestock derived form the Sotol plant. The company had a new patented process which produced a nutritious Sotol molasses. This molasses was then combined with the pith of the Sotol as well as some Alfalfa or other vegetable material. This livestock feed could be sold at "an extraordinary low price."

In a follow-up, in El Paso Herald, July 27, 1918, there was an advertisement for this new Sotol animal feed. The "Sotol Molasses Mixed Feed" contained a blend of 25% Alfalfa Meal, 25% Ground Sotol Plant, and 40% Sotol Molasses. There was then a breakdown touching on the feed's Fats, Protein, Nitrogen Free Extract & Crude Fiber and comparing them to beet pulp, showing that the molasses mixed feed was better for livestock. And the advertisement also stressed the low cost of this product.

Finally, I've heard some claim that there might have been a Sotol distillery in New Mexico, but that seems to be based on an incomplete information. The El Paso Times, September 24, 1923, detailed an account of a couple murders, and some other news accounts of this incident were much less detailed. Those shorter reports seemed to indicate one of the bodies was found near a Sotol distillery south of Columbus, New Mexico. That is factual, except that actually it was far enough south that it occurred in Mexico, not New Mexico.

The El Paso article noted that Holly Herring's body was found in a hollow near a Sotol distillery, but the article stated it was located on the south side of the Ojo Federico ranch, which is in Mexico. This was confirmed as the authorities in the U.S. had to obtain the permission of Mexico to retrieve the body and then it to the U.S. The Sotol distillery was thus located in the Chihuahua region of Mexico, and not in New Mexico.

There is limited evidence of Texans making illegal Sotol "moonshine," as well as smuggling over the border.  Sotol was used to produce denatured alcohol for fuel, though even that production was relatively small, as the companies ran into an assortment of problems producing it. There was also a single legal Sotol distillery in El Paso, which primarily produced Sotol during 1917. How it got around the law making Mezcal and Sotol distilleries illegal in the U.S. remains a mystery. Maybe new research will one day resolve that matter. 

As more Mexican Sotol becomes available in the U.S. market, I recommend you seek it out. You'll find some local Mexican restaurants may carry one or two Sotol. Be adventurous and enjoy a new spirit!

"There is some resemblance between the cabbage and sotol, but there is no reason to conclude that cabbage beer is anything like mescal, one drop of which, it has been said, will make a rabbit go out and hunt a fight with a bulldog."
--Bryan Daily Eagle And Pilot, August 26, 1911

(Please be advised that my original article on Sotol was first published in 2017, but has since been revised and expanded a few times, due to additional research. This latest edition owes a big debt of gratitude to Steve Swinnea for pointing me toward the Cactus Fiber & Reduction Co., a legal distillery in Texas which produced Sotol.)